Medical expert of the article
New publications
Medicinal electrophoresis: how it works
Last updated: 03.07.2025
All iLive content is medically reviewed or fact checked to ensure as much factual accuracy as possible.
We have strict sourcing guidelines and only link to reputable media sites, academic research institutions and, whenever possible, medically peer reviewed studies. Note that the numbers in parentheses ([1], [2], etc.) are clickable links to these studies.
If you feel that any of our content is inaccurate, out-of-date, or otherwise questionable, please select it and press Ctrl + Enter.
Drug electrophoresis is a non-invasive application of a weak direct current through the skin to transport charged drug molecules from a soaked pad beneath an active electrode into the superficial tissues, where a local depot is formed and diffusion occurs. This method is considered a controlled method of local delivery, bypassing the stratum corneum and reducing systemic exposure. [1]
The mechanism is based on the movement of ions under the influence of an electric field and the accompanying flow of solvent through the pores and ducts of sweat glands. These processes are described by two mechanisms: electromigration, that is, the repulsion of like charges, and electroosmosis, the volumetric flow of fluid from the anode to the cathode through the charged skin matrix. The balance of these mechanisms depends on the properties of the drug and the environment. [2]
In practice, electrophoresis is considered an adjunct to active rehabilitation rather than a replacement for causal treatment. The clinical value of this method is higher where short-term pain and inflammation reduction is required during exercise and load modification. The evidence base is mixed and shows the greatest benefit in specific scenarios with the correct selection of parameters and polarity. [3]
Table 1. Mechanisms and factors influencing delivery
| Parameter | The essence | Practical significance |
|---|---|---|
| Electromigration | Repulsion of like charges "drug - active electrode" | Determines the choice of polarity and active electrode |
| Electroosmosis | Volumetric transfer of water through the skin, usually from the anode to the cathode | Affects the transfer of weak bases and neutral molecules |
| Solution chemistry | pH, ionic strength, buffer, competing ions | Determines the fraction of ionized form and "current competition" |
| Area and contact | Size and fit of the pad, moisture | Affect current density and the risk of skin irritation |
| Electric current dose | Current-time product, typical target 40-80 mA min | Associated with the amount of charge transferred by the ions |
Source: Reviews of iontophoresis and modern transdermal delivery. [4]
How it works: the physics of the process and pharmacokinetics
The transport of charged molecules is controlled by an electric field gradient: negative ions are supplied from beneath the cathode, positive ions from beneath the anode. Penetration depth is limited primarily by the dermis and the upper layers of underlying tissue, but a skin "depot" is formed from which the molecules diffuse after the procedure. This ensures a localized, rather than systemic, exposure profile. [5]
Efficiency is affected by the size and charge of the molecule, the pH of the donor solution, the composition of the buffer, the type of electrodes, as well as the current strength and duration of exposure. For anions, competition with chloride released under the silver-chloride cathode is critical, requiring a rational solution formula without mobile co-anions. [6]
The current density is chosen to be safe: traditionally, a limit of approximately 0.5 mA per cm² of active electrode is used to minimize irritation and chemical burns. In clinical settings, the dose is often specified as mA min—for example, 40 mA min at a current of 2 mA for 20 minutes. [7]
Systemic absorption with topical administration is minimal, reducing the risk of systemic side effects compared to oral forms, although this profile requires experimental confirmation for each molecule. Studies on transdermal delivery emphasize the predominantly local action and the sharp increase in the transfer of polar, hydrophilic molecules compared to simple application. [8]
Table 2. Common drugs and choice of active electrode
| Substance and purpose | Charge in solution | Active electrode | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dexamethasone sodium phosphate for anti-inflammatory effect | Negative | Cathode | Competition with chloride ion is possible; a formula without mobile co-anions is preferable |
| Lidocaine hydrochloride for local anesthesia | Positive | Anode | The transfer during anodic feeding has been well studied |
| Acetic acid for soft tissue calcifications | Negative | Cathode | Used in research on plantar fasciitis |
| Salicylates in dermatological problems | Negative | Cathode | Polarity is negative, used in private clinical series |
Source: experimental and clinical work on polarity and formulation. [9]
Equipment, electrodes and dosing
A typical system consists of a continuously variable DC power source, an active electrode with a pad soaked in a medicinal solution, and a dispersed electrode that closes the circuit. Quality contact, uniform pad wetting, and stable fixation are important to avoid localized current surges. [10]
Safety is determined primarily by current density: as current density increases, the risk of local irritation and chemical burns increases due to a shift in pH directly beneath the electrode. An alkaline reaction with the formation of sodium hydroxide is possible beneath the cathode, while an acidic reaction is possible beneath the anode, which justifies the requirements for contact and time monitoring. [11]
The dose is controlled in mA min. In practice, ranges of 40-80 mA min are appropriate, depending on the goal and tolerance: for example, 4 mA for 10-20 minutes or 2 mA for 20-40 minutes. The threshold current is limited by calculation based on the area of the active electrode, so as not to exceed the safe density. [12]
For anionic drugs, cathodic feed is used, while for cationic drugs, anodic feed is used. The solution under the active electrode is prepared with the desired pH to maximize ionization of the target molecule and minimize competing ions. This increases the fraction of target transfer per given current dose. [13]
Table 3. Calculation of safe current and dose
| Size | Formula and benchmark | Calculation example |
|---|---|---|
| Current density | no more than 0.5 mA per cm² | With an area of 6 cm², the maximum current is 3 mA |
| Electric current dose | current × time, mA min | 2 mA x 20 minutes = 40 mA min |
| Session time | determined by dose and tolerance | 10-30 minutes while monitoring sensations |
| Pole selection | the drug and the active electrode have the same charge | Dexamethasone from under the cathode, lidocaine from under the anode |
Source: clinical guidelines on electrotherapy and review publications. [14]
Where the method is useful: evidence base for conditions
In lateral epicondylitis, randomized trials show pain reduction and improved function with dexamethasone iontophoresis, although the effects depend on the current dose, parameters, and concomitant therapy. Systematic reviews indicate benefits as an adjuvant procedure but emphasize the need for standardized protocols. [15]
In plantar fasciitis, early randomized trials demonstrated the superiority of dexamethasone iontophoresis in terms of short-term symptom relief, especially when used in a multimodal regimen with taping. Current trials continue to compare it with shockwave therapy and other methods, demonstrating comparable short-term effects in some patients. [16]
For soft tissue pain syndromes outside the aforementioned nosologies, the data are mixed: there are signs of benefit when polarity and dose selection guidelines are followed, but the quality of the evidence varies. Clinical guidelines for elbow pain emphasize the priority of active therapy, reserving electrophoresis as a supportive tool in individual cases. [17]
In the area of the temporomandibular joint and some dermatological applications, positive clinical observations and case series have been described with the use of corticosteroids and salicylates, but more powerful studies are needed for broad recommendations. Translational reviews indicate increased transport for polar hydrophilic molecules compared to simple application. [18]
Table 4. Evidence map for the use of drug electrophoresis
| Nosology | Summary of pain and function | Horizon of effect | Comment on quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lateral epicondylitis | Reduced pain, improved function | Short term | RCT, effect depends on dose and protocol |
| Plantar fasciitis | Rapid relief in some patients | Short term | RCT: Combination with taping enhances the effect |
| TMJ and local inflammatory syndromes | Signals of benefit | Short term | Case series, limited evidence |
| Other soft tissue pains | Heterogeneous | Short term | Standardized RCTs are needed |
Source: clinical studies and reviews. [19]
Diagnostic use: pilocarpine iontophoresis test
A separate, well-standardized application of electrical current to move a substance through the skin is pilocarpine sweat stimulation for a quantitative sweat chloride test in cystic fibrosis. Iontophoresis lasts 5 minutes, then sweat is collected for up to 30 minutes using a method approved by professional societies. [20]
The Gibson-Cook method and modern sweat collection systems remain the "gold standard" for screening and diagnosis with appropriate preanalysis. Threshold values are interpreted as follows: less than 30 mmol/L is normal, 30-59 mmol/L is the intermediate zone, and 60 mmol/L and above is the diagnostic range. [21]
It is important to distinguish the diagnostic pilocarpine iontophoresis procedure from medicinal electrophoresis: the goals, solutions and areas of action differ, but both methods rely on the same physical principles of ion transfer through the skin. [22]
Table 5. Interpretation of the sweat chloride test
| Indicator | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Norm | less than 30 mmol per l |
| Border zone | 30-59 mmol/L |
| Diagnostic range | 60 mmol/L and above |
Source: Clinical guidelines for sweat testing.[23]
Safety, contraindications and adverse reactions
The main risks are related to the skin's reaction to the current: tingling, erythema, and rare chemical burns due to high current density, poor contact, or an overdried pad. An alkaline reaction is possible under the cathode, and an acidic reaction under the anode, which explains why prevention involves monitoring parameters and moisture. [24]
Absolute contraindications include implantable electronic devices in the treatment area and skin integrity under the electrode for a specific drug. Relative restrictions include pregnancy for certain areas, epilepsy, severe dermatoses, and drug allergies. The decision is made individually, taking into account alternatives. [25]
Systemic side effects are rare due to minimal resorption with the local regimen, but may occur if the technique is not followed or polarity is not observed. Safety is enhanced by Ag/AgCl electrodes, correct calculation of current density, and careful patient education. [26]
When using anionic corticosteroids, competition with chloride ions at the cathode must be taken into account, affecting the delivered drug dose and requiring a correct solution formula. This is a pharmaceutical aspect of safety and efficacy. [27]
Table 6. Common problems and prevention
| Problem | Probable cause | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Burning sensation under the electrode | Excessive current density, poor contact | Increase area, reduce current, moisten the pad |
| Skin irritation | pH shift under the cathode or anode | Reduce time, change pole to another drug |
| No effect | Incorrect polarity, competing ions | Check the charge of the molecule and the composition of the solution |
| Hyperemia after the procedure | Normal response to current | Explain to the patient, control the duration |
Source: Electrotherapy clinical practice guidelines and reviews. [28]
How to perform the procedure
Selection and Goal. Establish a measurable goal, such as a 30% pain reduction on a visual scale, and rule out contraindications. Select the drug, polarity, and zone, and coordinate the course as part of a multimodal plan with exercises and patient education. [29]
Preparation. Cleanse the skin, select an active electrode of the desired area, and soak the pad in fresh solution. Calculate the maximum current so that it does not exceed 0.5 mA per cm² of active electrode. Ensure the pad is securely attached and moist. [30]
Stimulation. Set the current so that the sensations are "noticeable but comfortable," and wait until the desired dose is reached, for example, 40 mA min. Monitor the sensations and skin condition. For anionic preparations, apply from under the cathode; for cationic preparations, from under the anode. [31]
Response assessment. Record parameters and effect after each session; if there is no clinically significant improvement after several visits, discontinue the course and adjust the plan in favor of methods with a strong evidence base. [32]
Table 7. Secure Session Checklist
| Step | Checkpoint | Not really |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose and contraindications | The goal is measurable, there are no contraindications | |
| Polarity | The polarity of the active electrode corresponds to the charge of the drug | |
| Current density | Does not exceed 0.5 mA per cm² | |
| Dose | 40-80 mA min was achieved according to tolerance | |
| Leather | Before and after examination, aftercare recommendations |
Source: guidelines and review publications. [33]
Conclusions
Medicinal electrophoresis is a controlled method for local delivery of charged molecules with well-understood process physics and predictable limitations on penetration depth. Its greatest practical value is noted as an adjunctive procedure within a multimodal plan for specific pain conditions, primarily with the correct polarity, current dose, and standardized methodology. Decisions are made individually, taking into account goals, risks, and alternatives. [34]

