^

Health

Hematopoietic stem cells of bone marrow and bone marrow transplantation

, medical expert
Last reviewed: 19.10.2021
Fact-checked
х

All iLive content is medically reviewed or fact checked to ensure as much factual accuracy as possible.

We have strict sourcing guidelines and only link to reputable media sites, academic research institutions and, whenever possible, medically peer reviewed studies. Note that the numbers in parentheses ([1], [2], etc.) are clickable links to these studies.

If you feel that any of our content is inaccurate, out-of-date, or otherwise questionable, please select it and press Ctrl + Enter.

Cellular transplantation began not with the derivatives of embryonic stem cells, but with the transplantation of bone marrow cells. Almost 50 years ago, the first studies on experimental bone marrow transplantation began with an analysis of the survival of animals under total irradiation with the subsequent infusion of hematopoietic cells in the bone marrow. The clinic studied the efficiency of the transplantation of syngeneic bone marrow in the treatment of acute refractory leukemia for radiotherapy, and for the first time, patients with acute forms of leukemia who underwent bone marrow transplantation from HLA-identical related donors were scanned. Already in seven cases of acute myeloblastic and in six acute lymphoblastic leukemia, as a result of bone marrow allotransplantation, it was possible to achieve complete remission, which lasted for 4.5 years without the use of maintenance therapy. In six patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia, the duration of disease-free survival after one bone marrow allotransplantation exceeded 10 years.

Subsequently, a retrospective analysis of the results of bone marrow allotransplantation was carried out repeatedly. The study of the University of California Los Angeles compared the effectiveness of bone marrow allotransplantation and treatment with high doses of cytosine-arabinoside in acute myelogenous leukemia in the phase of remission I (the age of patients 15 to 45 years). After bone marrow allotransplantation, a lower relapse rate (40% vs. 71%) was noted, but there were no significant intergroup differences in disease-free and overall survival. It was later found out that the phase of the disease at the time of bone marrow transplantation is one of the critical signs determining post-transplant survival. In studies of Canadian scientists, it has been shown that bone marrow transplantation during the chronic phase gives much better results than during accelerations or with a blast crisis of chronic myelogenous leukemia.

In a prospective randomized trial of J. Reiffers et al. (1989), the first demonstrative advantages of bone marrow allotransplantation were obtained before the treatment of hemoblastosis with chemotherapy alone - a thirty-month disease-free survival rate was four times higher after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Then, data on prolonged remission in 50% of patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia as a result of bone marrow allotransplantation, which were previously refractory to at least 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy, were presented.

At the same time, in almost all studies, the results of bone marrow allotransplantation during the blast crisis of chronic myelogenous leukemia were negative. In these patients, disease-free survival after bone marrow allotransplantation rapidly and progressively decreased, accounting for 43, 18 and 11% for 100 days, 1 year and 3 years, respectively, whereas the probability of recurrence of the disease for 2 years reached 73%. Nevertheless, bone marrow allotransplantation gives the patient, albeit small, but the chances of life, while even combined chemotherapy is completely incapable of providing long-term survival of patients in this category. Later it was shown that sometimes by carrying out chemotherapy with chronic myelogenous leukemia in the blast crisis phase of the lymphoid type, a short-term remission can be achieved. If during this period to perform an allogeneic bone marrow transplant, the probability of survival after transplantation increases to 44%.

The study of the factors influencing the survival and the frequency of relapses in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in the chronic phase led to the conclusion that the age of the patient is under 30 years old, the bone marrow transplantation is performed for 2 years after diagnosis, and the female the sex of the patient and the donor are associated with the best results. In the presence of such pre-transplantation characteristics, 6-8-year recurrence-free survival is 75-80%, and the probability of recurrence of the disease does not exceed 10-20%. However, in the case of bone marrow allotransplantation during the acceleration phase, the posttransplantation survival of patients is sharply reduced, which is associated with an increase in the frequency of relapses and with an increase in mortality not caused by recurrence of hemoblastosis.

The next rather large randomized prospective study was conducted in 1995 by the EORTC and GIMEMA groups. The object of the comparative analysis was the results of bone marrow allotransplantation and consolidating high-dose chemotherapy with cytosine-arabinoside and daunorubicin. Before bone marrow transplantation, myeloablative conditioning was performed in two versions: cyclophosphamide + total irradiation and busulfan + cyclophosphamide. Four-year recurrence-free survival after bone marrow allografting was 55%, after autotransplantation - 48%, after high-dose chemotherapy - 30%. The risk of recurrence was significantly lower after bone marrow allotransplantation - both in relation to its autotransplantation and in comparison with chemotherapy (24, 41 and 57%, respectively). Reliable intergroup differences in overall survival were absent, since in all cases of relapse after chemotherapy intensive anti-relapse treatment was performed, and when remission II was achieved, autotransplantation of bone marrow cells was achieved.

Improvement of methods of hemoblastosis treatment continued. A. Mitus et al. (1995) reported on the results of treatment of adult patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia who underwent induction and consolidation of remission with high doses of cytosine-arabinoside, followed by bone marrow allo- or autotransplantation. Regardless of the type of transplantation, the four-year recurrence-free survival rate was 62%. The frequency of relapses was significantly higher in patients who underwent bone marrow autotransplantation.

Gradually expanded and the possibilities of anti-relapse treatment. A generalization of the results of adoptive immunotherapy with bone marrow donor lymphocytes has shown its high efficacy in chronic myelogenous leukemia. The use of adoptive immunotherapy against a background of cytogenetic relapse led to complete remission in 88% of patients, and after infusion of bone marrow donor lymphocytes against a background of hematologic relapse, complete remission was induced in 72% of patients. The probability of five-year survival in the case of adoptive therapy was 79 and 55%, respectively.

In an expanded study of the European bone marrow transplantation group, posttransplantation dynamics of oncohematological diseases after bone marrow allo- and autotransplantation was studied in 1114 adult patients. In general, there was a higher disease-free survival rate and a lower risk of relapse after bone marrow allotransplantation. Further, an in-depth retrospective analysis of the efficiency of auto- and allotransplantation of bone marrow cells in hemoblastoses was conducted. Depending on cytogenetic disorders in blast cells, patients were divided into groups of low, standard and high risk of relapse. The recurrence-free survival in the patients of the examined groups after bone marrow allotransplantation was 67, 57 and 29%, respectively. After bone marrow autotransplantation, carried out in patients with standard and high-risk groups, the recurrence-free survival was less - 48 and 21%. On the basis of the data obtained, bone marrow allotransplantation during the period of remission I in patients with standard and high-risk groups was considered appropriate. At the same time, in patients with a prognostically favorable karyotype bone marrow transplantation, the author recommends postponing until the onset of relapse I or remission II.

However, the results of bone marrow allotransplantation in acute myeloblastic leukemia outside remission I can not be considered satisfactory. The probability of a three-year recurrence-free survival after transplantation with an untreated relapse I is only 29-30%, and in the period of remission II - 22-26%. Since remission with chemotherapy can be achieved in no more than 59% of patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia, bone marrow allotransplantation can be performed in early relapse I, since this step can still improve survival rates. In order to be able to perform bone marrow allotransplantation at the first sign of a relapse, it is necessary to perform HLA-typing in all patients immediately after reaching remission I. Less often, bone marrow allotransplantation is used to consolidate remission I in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nevertheless, the implementation of bone marrow allotransplant in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the case of a high risk of relapse with chemotherapy allows a three- and five-year recurrence-free survival rate to increase to 34 and 62%.

Even in the case of such an extremely unfavorable variant of hemoblastosis as Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, in which the duration of induced remission does not exceed one year, the use of bone marrow allotransplantation as a consolidation of remission I contributes to a significant improvement in treatment outcomes: the probability of a three-year recurrence-free survival rate increases to 60% , and the relapse rate is reduced to 9%. Therefore, in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia characterized by unfavorable prognostic signs suggesting a high risk of recurrence, it is advisable to perform bone marrow allotransplantation during remission I. Much worse results were found in bone marrow allotransplantation in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia during remission II or on the onset of recurrence : three- and five-year recurrence-free survival was less than 10%, and the relapse rate reached 65%.

In the early relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, which has arisen against ongoing supportive chemotherapy or soon after its abolition, patients should immediately perform bone marrow allotransplantation without resorting to second-line chemotherapy (to reduce the accumulation of cytotoxins in the blood). In cases of recurrence of acute lymphoblastic leukemia after prolonged remission, I should be directed to the induction of remission II, which will make it possible to increase the efficiency of subsequent allotransplantation.

Increase the effectiveness of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation by optimizing air conditioning techniques. I. Demidova and co-authors (2003), in the preparation for bone marrow transplantation in patients with leukemia, conditioning based on consecutive application of busulfan in a dose of 8 mg / kg, which causes a sufficiently deep myelosuppression. The data obtained by the authors indicate that the use of busulfan ensures successful engraftment of the donor bone marrow in the majority of patients with hemoblastosis. The absence of engraftment was observed only in two cases. In the first of these, the inconsistency of the transplant was associated with a small number of transfused hematopoietic progenitor cells (1.2 x 108 / kg). In the second case, anti-HLA antibodies were detected in a high titer. In all patients, the dynamics of transplant engraftment depended, first of all, on the initial volume of the tumor mass. Gradual rejection of the transplant was observed in those cases when more than 20% of blast cells were detected in the bone marrow of the recipient.

The emergence of new drugs that have the ability to express immunosuppression without significant depression of hematopoiesis (for example, fludarabine), can significantly increase the therapeutic effectiveness of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation by reducing the early lethality, which is often due to the high toxicity of the applied pre-transplantation regimens.

It should be emphasized that the effectiveness of bone marrow allotransplantation is largely limited by the development of relapse of leukemia, especially in patients with advanced stages of the disease (second and subsequent remission of acute leukemia, the phase of accelerated chronic myelogenous leukemia). In this regard, great attention is paid to the search for the most effective methods of treating post-transplantation relapses. The first step in the treatment of early relapse in allogeneic bone marrow recipients under the condition of the absence of a severe "graft versus host" reaction is the abrupt cessation of immunosuppressive therapy by the abolition of cyclosporin A. In some patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia and acute hemoblastoses, the abolition of immunosuppression can improve the course of the disease, the "graft versus host" reaction stops the progression of leukemia. However, in most cases, a detailed picture of the recurrence of the disease dictates the need for immediate cytostatic therapy. An important factor determining the results of chemotherapy is the interval between bone marrow transplantation and the onset of recurrence of hemoblastosis.

The most intensive attempt at eradication of the tumor clone is the second bone marrow transplantation undertaken for the relapse of leukemia. However, in this case, the success of treatment is highly dependent on the time interval between the first bone marrow transplantation and the appearance of signs of recurrence of the disease. In addition, the intensity of previous chemotherapy, the phase of the disease and the general condition of the patient are of great importance. At the second bone marrow transplant, performed less than a year after the first, there is a high lethality, directly associated with transplantation. In this case, the three-year recurrence-free survival rate does not exceed 20%. Patients with relapse after syngeneic or autologous bone marrow transplantation sometimes successfully undergo second allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from HLA-identical sibling, but in these cases severe toxic complications associated with the conditioning regime are noted.

In this regard, methods are being developed to combat relapses of hemoblastoses based on the use of adoptive immunotherapy. According to a clinical study by N. Kolb and co-authors (1990), in patients with hematologic relapse of chronic myelogenous leukemia after bone marrow allografting, complete cytogenetic remission can be induced by transfusions of bone marrow donor lymphocytes without the use of chemotherapy or radiation therapy. The effect of "graft versus leukemia" after transfusions of bone marrow donor lymphocytes is described in acute leukemia.

trusted-source[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]

Factors affecting bone marrow transplantation

Among the negative prognostic factors affecting the results of bone marrow allotransplantation in patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia, the age of the patient, high leukocytosis at the time of diagnosis, the presence of M4-M6 (according to the FAB classification), a long period of the disease before bone marrow transplantation, as well as a prolonged absence of remission. According to the estimates of the majority of specialists, the most promising method for the treatment of posttransplantation relapses is adoptive immunotherapy with the use of bone marrow donor lymphocytes, especially in the case of relapse of leukemia within the first year after bone marrow transplantation, since intensive chemotherapy is accompanied by extremely high lethality during these periods.

In patients with relapse that occurred later than a year after bone marrow transplantation, repeated remissions can be induced more often. However, these results of treatment can not be considered satisfactory due to the short-term achieved remissions. A retrospective study of the European bone marrow transplantation group showed that standard chemotherapy allows to achieve a remission in 40% of patients with acute leukemia, but the duration is not more than 8-14 months. In all, 3% of patients have a remission period of more than 2 years.

In posttransplant recurrences, the results of adoptive immunotherapy worsen in patients with acute leukemia - only in 29% of patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia and only 5% of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia manage to induce remission by transfusion of donor lymphocytes. The probability of five-year survival of patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia is 15%, and among patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia this indicator of the effectiveness of hemoblastosis treatment does not exceed 2 years. It is particularly difficult to achieve remission in the case of relapse of leukemia within 100 days after bone marrow transplantation, which is always accompanied by extremely high lethality, since chemotherapy in such patients causes severe toxic complications due to pre-transplantation conditioning, as well as high sensitivity of recently transplanted bone marrow to cytostatic drugs.

In principle, the strategy for treating hemoblastoses should be aimed at eliminating the pathological clone, which, unfortunately, is not always feasible. In particular, three different tactical approaches are currently used to treat chronic myelogenous leukemia: chemotherapy, interferon or glivec therapy, and bone marrow allotransplantation. Chemotherapy can only reduce the volume of the tumor. Recombinant interferon and glyvek can significantly limit the size of the leukemia clone (cytogenetic improvement is observed in 25-50% of patients) and even completely eliminate pathological clone in 5-15%, and according to some data - in 30% of patients, which is confirmed by the results of both cytogenetic and molecular-biological studies. Allotransplantation of the bone marrow in the treatment of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia was first applied in the 70s of the XX century. In 1979, A. Fefer and co-authors reported on the results of syngeneic bone marrow transplantation in 4 patients in the chronic phase of chronic myelogenous leukemia. The leukemia clone was successfully eliminated in all patients. In 1982, A. Fefer provided data on the results of syngeneic bone marrow transplantation in 22 patients, of which in 12 patients transplantation was performed in the chronic phase of the disease. Five of them lived after bone marrow transplantation without recurrence of chronic myelogenous leukemia from 17 years to 21 years (with no reports of death in the scientific literature to date). In one patient, disease-free survival reached 17.5 years after the first and 8 years after the second, performed for the relapse of the disease, bone marrow transplantation.

The question of the timing of bone marrow allotransplantation in chronic myelogenous leukemia remains to this day not only relevant but also controversial. This is partly due to the fact that randomized studies to evaluate the effectiveness of bone marrow transplantation in comparison with chemotherapy or therapy with interferon and glivec was not carried out. L. Mendeleeva (2003) notes that chemotherapy provides a comfortable survival rate for almost all patients within 2-4 years. Treatment with interferon and glyvek (long and costly), accompanied by a certain discomfort (flu-like syndrome, depression, etc.). In addition, until now it has not been determined whether complete cancellation of the drugs is possible after the cytogenetic effect has been achieved. Allograft bone marrow is also expensive treatment, and is also accompanied by a number of serious complications. However, the transplantation of allogeneic bone marrow is the only method for treating chronic myelogenous leukemia, * with which one can achieve biological cure by eliminating a clone of pathological cells.

In some studies, a comparative analysis of the efficiency of bone marrow allotransplantation, chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation was performed. In most studies, randomization for bone marrow transplantation was determined by the presence of an HLA-identical donor. In the absence of such patients, chemotherapy or bone marrow autotransplantation was performed. In a prospective extensive study of the results of treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the phase of remission I, the probability of a five-year disease-free survival after bone marrow allotransplantation did not differ from those in patients receiving chemotherapy or autologous bone marrow transplant. However, a discriminant analysis of the results of treatment with regard to prognostic factors (Rh-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, age over 35 years, the level of leukocytosis in the diagnosis and the time taken to achieve remission) revealed significant differences in the five-year survival in patients receiving allogeneic (44% ) or autologous (20%) bone marrow, and patients undergoing chemotherapy (20%).

In the work of N. Chao and co-authors (1991), the criteria for carrying out bone marrow allotransplantation in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in phase I of remission were also leukocytosis and extra-oesophageal lesions in the onset of the disease - t (9, 22), t (4, 11 ), t (8,14), age over 30 years and, in addition, no remission after the first phase of the induction course of chemotherapy. Most patients had bone marrow allotransplantation in the first 4 months after remission was achieved. At almost nine years of average follow-up, disease-free survival after transplantation was 61% at 10% relapse.

Thus, allogeneic bone marrow transplantation is a rather effective method of treating tumor diseases of the blood system. According to different authors, the long-term survival of patients with hemoblastosis, who underwent bone marrow transplantation, is 29 to 67% depending on the risk group. Therapy of this kind not only exerts a powerful cytostatic (radiomimetic) effect on tumor cells, but also causes the development of the "graft versus leukemia" reaction, which is based, for the time being, on the not very clear mechanism of immunological displacement of the residual tumor clone. In recent years, this phenomenon has been given a leading role in providing an antitumor effect in bone marrow transplantation.

The results of some studies indicate that with the use of bone marrow allotransplantation, it is possible to achieve improvement even in cases when chemotherapy can not be induced to remission. In particular, A Zander and co-authors (1988) report positive results of treatment in three of the nine patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia, whose bone marrow allotransplantation was performed after ineffective remission induction. It should be noted that in recent years the attitude towards bone marrow allotransplantation in acute myeloblastic leukemia has changed significantly. This method of treatment, previously used only in patients with refractory leukemia, moved to the area of intensive consolidation of complete remission of acute myeloblastic leukemia. Since the beginning of the 1980s, all published clinical studies have indicated that bone marrow allotransplantation is the most effective therapy for patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia in remission I (provided there is an HLA-identical related donor and no contraindications to bone marrow transplantation). According to different authors, the recurrence-free survival of recipients after bone marrow allografting for more than five years is 46-62%, the overall survival rate exceeds 50%, and the relapse rate does not reach 18%.

A problematic issue remains the use of bone marrow allotransplantation in the period of a detailed clinical picture of leukemia. Multifactor analysis aimed at the search for predictors of bone marrow allotransplantation in the accelerating phase included the age of patients, the duration of the disease, the nature of previous chemotherapy, the presence of leukocytosis in the onset of the disease, the size of the spleen in diagnosis and before bone marrow transplantation, donor and recipient sex, and the presence of Ph-chromosome and other cytogenetic disorders. It has been established that the factors contributing to the improvement of survival and the reduction of non-relapse-related mortality are the young age of the recipient (up to 37 years) and the absence of hematologic changes characteristic for the acceleration phase (the diagnosis was based on additional cytogenetic changes).

The accumulated experience in the treatment of various forms of leukemia, aplastic anemia and a number of other serious diseases of the blood system through bone marrow transplantation proves that the transplantation of allogeneic bone marrow in many cases allows a radical cure. At the same time, in clinical transplantology there is a complex problem of selecting an HLA-identical bone marrow donor. Adoptive immunotherapy of relapses of leukemias also has its limitations, which is manifested by different efficacy of transfusions of bone marrow donor's lymphocytes, depending on the characteristics of leukemia cells.

In addition, leukemia cells have a different sensitivity to the cytotoxic effects of such cytokines as tumor necrosis factor, interferons and IL-12. In addition, the in vivo transfer of genes coding for the synthesis of cytokines is currently being considered theoretically. In the field of cytokine-genetic therapy of hemoblastoses, the issues of resistance of the gene to degradation, as well as its packaging, allowing selectively reaching the target cell, integrating into the genome and expressing the protein product, while ensuring safety for other cells of the body, remain problematic. Currently, methods for the controlled expression of a therapeutic gene are being developed, in particular, gene delivery by ligands to certain unique receptors on the surface of the target cell is tested, as well as specific protection of vectors from inactivation in human blood plasma. Retroviral vector constructs are created, stable in blood, tissue-specific and selectively transducing dividing or non-dividing cells.

And yet the main problem of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation is the deficiency of HLA-compatible donors. Despite the fact that in Europe, America and Asia there are already a number of hematopoietic donor donors with more than 7 million potential donors of bone marrow and cord blood stem cells for 2002, requests for HLA-compatible hematopoietic cells even for children with diseases of the blood system are met only by 30-60%. In addition, if such a donor is available in the American or European registries, the cost of finding and delivering the donor bone marrow to the transplant center will be between $ 25,000 and $ 50,000.

Bone marrow transplantation after hemo- and immunosuppression of reduced intensity (low-dose conditioning) is widely used throughout the world in the treatment of a variety of diseases, from hemoblastosis to systemic connective tissue diseases. However, the problem of choosing the optimal conditioning mode has not been solved yet. Despite the use of various combinations of immunosuppressants, chemotherapy and small doses of radiation, it remains an open question to achieve the combined effect of low toxicity and immunosuppression sufficient to ensure engraftment of the graft.

Thus, bone marrow allotransplantation is currently the most effective method for treating hemoblastoses, which is due not only to the intense antitumor effect of pre-transplant conditioning, but also to the powerful immune effect of "graft versus leukemia." Numerous research centers continue to study ways of prolonging relapse-free survival of allogeneic bone marrow recipients. The problems of selecting patients, the timing of bone marrow transplantation, monitoring and the optimal treatment regimen for the minimal residual disease, which is the cause of post-transplantation relapse of leukemia, are discussed. Bone marrow transplantation has entered the practice of treating many non-oncological diseases of the blood and some congenital diseases, as well as acute radiation damage to the bone marrow. Bone marrow transplantation often gives a radical effect in the treatment of aplastic anemia and other mielodepressive conditions. In Europe and America, registers of HLA-type donors have been created, willing to voluntarily sacrifice their bone marrow for the treatment of patients who need to replace and / or repair hemopoietic tissue. However, despite the large number of potential bone marrow donors, its use is limited due to the high prevalence of cytomegalovirus infection among donors, the duration of the search for the donor (average 135 days) and large financial costs. In addition, for some ethnic minorities, the probability of selecting an HLA-identical donor bone marrow is only 40-60%. Annually clinics register about 2800 children, who first fell ill with acute leukemia, from 30 to 60% of whom need bone marrow transplantation. However, only one third of these patients can find an immunologically compatible donor. There is still a high incidence of severe "graft-versus-host" reactions in recipients of the bone marrow, and in unrelated transplantation this complication occurs in 60-90% of patients.

trusted-source[14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]

Translation Disclaimer: For the convenience of users of the iLive portal this article has been translated into the current language, but has not yet been verified by a native speaker who has the necessary qualifications for this. In this regard, we warn you that the translation of this article may be incorrect, may contain lexical, syntactic and grammatical errors.

You are reporting a typo in the following text:
Simply click the "Send typo report" button to complete the report. You can also include a comment.