Medical expert of the article
New publications
Congenital anomalies of the upper extremities
Last reviewed: 07.07.2025

All iLive content is medically reviewed or fact checked to ensure as much factual accuracy as possible.
We have strict sourcing guidelines and only link to reputable media sites, academic research institutions and, whenever possible, medically peer reviewed studies. Note that the numbers in parentheses ([1], [2], etc.) are clickable links to these studies.
If you feel that any of our content is inaccurate, out-of-date, or otherwise questionable, please select it and press Ctrl + Enter.
In pediatric orthopedics, congenital anomalies of the upper limbs are a rare pathology, which, however, has a variety of clinical signs.
This is why a single, generally accepted treatment tactic and treatment methods have not yet been developed. Most surgeons suggest that parents wait until the child has finished growing (i.e. until 14-16 years old) and then begin any surgical interventions. As experience shows, beginning treatment at this age is often pointless. All leading surgeons specializing in hand surgery (according to foreign literary sources) believe that upper limb deformities should be eliminated as early as possible, before the child becomes aware of them and develops adaptive stereotypes of function. Therefore, a doctor who has identified a congenital malformation of the upper limbs in a child will greatly appreciate the prompt referral for consultation and diagnosis to a specialized hand surgery center.
I.V. Shvedovchenko (1993) developed a classification of congenital malformations of the upper limbs, and the author systematized and presented in the form of a table all forms of underdevelopment according to teratological series. The basic principles, strategy and tactics of treating congenital malformations of the upper limbs were developed.
Classification of congenital malformations of the upper limbs
Defect variant |
Characteristics of the defect |
Localization of the defect |
Clinical designation of the defect |
I. Defects caused by violation of linear and volumetric parameters of the upper limb |
A. Towards a decrease |
Transverse distal |
Brachydactyly Ectrodactyly Adactyly Hypoplasia Aplasia |
Transverse proximal |
Proximal ectromelia of the arm |
||
Splits of the wrist |
|||
Longitudinal distal |
Clubhand ulnar and radial |
||
B. Towards an increase |
Longitudinal proximal |
Gigantism |
|
II. Defects caused by disturbance of quantitative relationships in the upper limb |
Brushes |
Polyphalangy Polydactyly Beam doubling |
|
I finger |
Triphalangism |
||
Forearms |
Duplication of the ulna |
||
III. Defects caused by impaired differentiation of soft tissues |
Brushes |
Syndactyly Tightening in isolated form |
|
Forearms and shoulders |
Tightening in isolated form |
||
IV, Defects caused by impaired differentiation of the musculoskeletal system |
Brushes |
Brachymetacarpy |
|
Forearms |
Radioulnar synostosis Radial-humeral synostosis Madelung's deformity |
||
V. Defects caused by impaired differentiation of the tendon-muscle apparatus |
Brushes |
Stenoesing ligamentitis Camptodactyly Flexion-adduction contracture of the first finger Congenital ulnar deviation of the hand |
|
VI. Combined defects |
Developmental defects as combinations of the listed pathological conditions |
As an isolated manifestation of hand damage As a syndrome complex |
How to examine?
Использованная литература