Medical expert of the article
New publications
Assessment of the severity of injury
Last reviewed: 23.04.2024
All iLive content is medically reviewed or fact checked to ensure as much factual accuracy as possible.
We have strict sourcing guidelines and only link to reputable media sites, academic research institutions and, whenever possible, medically peer reviewed studies. Note that the numbers in parentheses ([1], [2], etc.) are clickable links to these studies.
If you feel that any of our content is inaccurate, out-of-date, or otherwise questionable, please select it and press Ctrl + Enter.
Scale of injury assessment
Trauma Score (Champion NA, et al., 1981)
The trauma evaluation scale assesses the key physiological parameters, a change in which, after trauma, allows patients at risk to be identified. The scale includes five main vital indicators: respiration rate, respiration pattern, systolic blood pressure, capillary filling time, Glasgow coma scale (GCS).
Options | Characteristics | Points |
Capillary filling time |
Naughty |
2 |
Delay |
1 |
|
Absent |
0 |
|
Scale Coma Glasgow |
14-15 |
5 |
11-13 |
4 |
|
8-10 |
3 |
|
5-7 |
2 |
|
3-4 |
1 |
|
Breathing rate |
> 36 per minute |
2 |
25-35 per minute |
3 |
|
10-24 per minute |
4 |
|
0-9 per minute |
1 |
|
Absent |
0 |
|
The nature of breathing |
Normal |
1 |
Superficial |
0 |
|
Intermittent |
0 |
|
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg. Art. |
> 90 mm Hg. Art. |
4 |
70-89 mm Hg. Art. |
3 |
|
50-69 mm Hg. Art. |
2 |
|
0-49 mm Hg. Art. |
1 |
|
Lack of pulse |
0 |
Score on the injury scale is made by summing the results according to the five characteristics presented above. The maximum score is 16 points, and the minimum score is 1 point.
The impact of the evaluation on the injury scale (PI) on the probability of survival (BB) is presented below.
PC |
16 |
15 |
14 |
13 |
12 |
Eleven |
10 |
9 |
8 |
7th |
6th |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
BB |
99 |
98 |
95 |
91 |
83 |
71 |
55 |
37 |
22 |
12 |
07 |
04 |
02 |
01 |
0 |
Modified scale of injury assessment
Revised Trauma Score (RTS) (Champion HR et al., 1986)
A modified scale for assessing trauma is often used in case of emergency with a large number of victims right at the scene.
Options |
Characteristics |
Points |
Breathing rate |
10-29 per minute |
4 |
> 29 per minute |
3 |
|
6-9 per minute |
2 |
|
1-5 per minute |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Systolic blood pressure |
> 89 mm Hg. Art. |
4 |
76-89 mm Hg. Art. |
3 |
|
50-75 mm Hg. Art. |
2 |
|
1-49 mm Hg. Art. |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Scale Coma Glasgow |
13-15 |
4 |
9-12 |
3 |
|
6-8 |
2 |
|
4-5 |
1 |
|
3 |
0 |
An evaluation of the modified injury scale is carried out by summing up the results for each individual trait.
The maximum score (reflecting the degree of maximum damage) is 12 points, and the minimum (minimum damage) is 0.
When assessing <11 points, the trauma is potentially dangerous, and such patients must be hospitalized in specialized departments. 3.
Injury index
Trauma Index (Kirkpatric JR, Youmans RL, 1971)
Options |
Characteristics |
Points |
Head or neck |
6th |
|
Area of damage |
Chest or stomach |
4 |
Back |
3 |
|
Skin or limbs |
1 |
|
Mixed trauma |
6th |
|
Type of damage |
Blunt Trauma |
4 |
Knife wound |
3 |
|
Rupture or bruise |
1 |
|
Lack of pulse |
6th |
|
Blood pressure <80 HR> 140 |
4 |
|
The cardiovascular system |
Blood pressure <100 HR> 100 |
3 |
External bleeding |
1 |
|
Norm |
0 |
|
Coma |
6th |
|
Central nervous system |
Loss of sensitivity and movement |
4 |
Sopor |
3 |
|
Stunning |
1 |
|
Norm |
0 |
|
Lack of breathing and cyanosis |
6th |
|
The presence of aspiration |
4 |
|
Respiratory system |
Violation of the rhythm of breathing and hemoptysis |
3 |
Chest pain |
1 |
|
Norm |
0 |
The injury index can be used to quickly assess patients with traumatic injury.
Gradation of severity of damage:
Minimal damage is 1 point.
Damage of moderate severity - 3-4 points.
Severe damage - 6 points.
The score on the injury index is based on the summation of the results of the study of all signs of the scale. The minimum score is 2 points, and the maximum is 30. When assessing more than 7 points the patient must be hospitalized.
Nb !: The injury index is not intended to assess the severity of patients with burns.
Scale of severity assessment of injuries CRAMS
CRAMS Scale Score (ClemmerT, P. Et al., 1985)
The CRAMS scale (circulation, respiration, abdomen, motor, speech) is based on 5 parameters, the rapid assessment of which allows us to identify a group of patients in need of transportation to specialized departments. This approach allows us to sort patients who do not need treatment in specialized trauma units. The scale includes five main indicators:
- Systolic BP or time of capillary filling.
- Breath.
- The nature of damage to the chest or abdomen.
- Physical activity.
- Speech reaction.
Options | Characteristics | Points |
Systolic blood pressure or capillary filling time |
AD> 100 mm. Gt; Art. Or normal capillary filling time |
2 |
85 |
1 |
|
Blood pressure <85 mm. Gt; Art. Or lack of capillary filling |
0 |
|
Breath |
Normal |
2 |
Abnormal (difficult, weak, frequent)> 35 per minute |
1 |
|
Absent |
0 |
|
The nature of damage to the chest or abdomen |
Abdominal or thoracic walls painless |
2 |
Abdominal or thoracic walls painless |
1 |
|
The abdominal wall is strained, the chest wall flotates or deep penetrating wounds of both cavities |
0 |
|
The motor reaction |
Normal |
2 |
Only in pain |
1 |
|
Absent |
0 |
|
Speech Reaction |
Correct |
2 |
Some indistinct words |
1 |
|
Speech is absent |
0 |
Dependence of mortality on the severity of injury on the CRAMS scale
Severity of injury according to the CRAMS scale |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6th |
7th |
8 |
9 |
10 |
Mortality,% |
100 |
80 |
83 |
86 |
80 |
32 |
15 |
3.3 |
0.5 |
0 |
0 |
CRAMS score = Results of systolic blood pressure or time of capillary filling + Results of breath study + Damage assessment + Motor reaction evaluation + Evaluation of speech production.
The maximum score (indicating the smallest defeat) is 10, and the minimum score (indicating the largest defeat) is 0 points.
A score of <8 points indicates severe trauma (patients need urgent surgical intervention), and in assessing 5-9 points, only minimal damage occurs.
The abbreviated scale of damage
Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) (Copes WS, Sacco WJ, Champion HR, Bain LW, 1969)
The abbreviated (short) AIS damage scale is an injury assessment system that allows you to accurately determine the severity of the damage. It was first proposed in 1969, but at present it has undergone significant changes. The latest changes were made to the scale in 1990.
Damages are ranked on a scale from 1 to 6 points, where 1 is the minimum damage, 5 - heavy and 6 - disparate with life.
AIS scores |
Damage |
1 |
Lung |
2 |
Medium |
3 |
Heavy |
4 |
Very heavy |
5 |
Extremely heavy |
6th |
Terminal |
Injury Severity Score (ISS) (Baker SP et al., 1974)
The ISS severity rating is an anatomical system for assessing the severity of injury, which was suggested for use in patients with multiple wounds. The ISS score is based on gradations of severity of damage that are used in the AIS scale and are ranked from 1 to 5 points:
- score - trauma of mild severity;
- score - a trauma of an average degree of gravity;
- score - not a life-threatening injury of moderate severity;
- score - a life-threatening injury with a high probability of survival of the patient;
- points - a trauma incompatible with life.
At the same time, it should be noted that, unlike the AIS scale, all lesions are distributed over the anatomical areas (head and neck, chest, abdomen, limbs and pelvis, external injuries), which makes it possible to identify areas with the most severe injuries.
When analyzing the severity of damage, only the maximum damage assessment of each area of the body is used. For the total assessment on the ISS scale, the three most affected areas of the body are taken, after which the most severe lesions in these areas are allocated and their estimates are squared. The overall score on the ISS scale is equal to the sum of the squares of the estimates of the three most severe lesions. An example of the ISS scale calculation is presented below.
Anatomical Region |
Description of damage |
Evaluation |
Evaluation |
Head and neck |
Cerebral Contusion |
3 |
9 |
Face |
No Injury |
0 |
|
Chest |
Flail Chest |
4 |
16 |
Stomach |
Minor Contusion of Liver |
2 |
|
Complex Rupture Spleen |
5 |
25 |
|
Limbs and pelvis |
Fractured femur |
3 |
|
Leather, soft fabrics |
No Injury |
0 |
|
Overall score on the ISS scale |
50 |
The maximum score on the ISS scale is 75 points, and the minimum score is zero. In the event that at least one damage has an estimate of five, the total score on the ISS scale is immediately estimated at 75 points.
The ISS scale is in fact the only anatomical assessment system and closely correlates with mortality, morbidity, hospital stay and other severity criteria.
Mortality correlation with the ISS score
Evaluation |
Mortality,% <49 |
Mortality,% 50-69 |
Mortality,%> 70 |
5 |
0 |
3 |
13 |
10 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
15 |
3 |
5 |
16 |
20 |
6th |
16 |
31 |
25 |
9 |
26th |
44 |
Thirty |
21 |
42 |
65 |
35 |
31 |
56 |
82 |
40 |
47 |
62 |
92 |
45 |
61 |
67 |
100 |
50 |
75 |
83 |
100 |
55 |
89 |
100 |
100 |
At the same time, despite the numerous advantages of the ISS scale, it should be noted that a mistake in assessing the degree of severity on the AIS scale can lead to errors in the overall assessment of ISS. It should also be noted that various injuries can get the same score on the ISS scale, while the effect of the damage area on the final score on the scale is not yet determined.
In addition, the ISS scale can not be used to sort victims, as in most cases the final diagnosis can not always be established without detailed patient examination or surgical intervention.
Scale for assessing the severity of injury and injury
Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) (Boyd CR, Toison MA, Copes WS, 1987)
The scale for assessing the severity of injuries and injuries was developed to determine the amount of necessary trauma care in patients with severe injuries by predicting survival.
It is designed for use in small hospitals to assess the quality of care or compare outcomes in different health facilities.
The scale is represented by three subscales (modified RTS injury scale, ISS scale, patient age rating scale) and coefficients for blunt and penetrating wound.
Evaluation of the modified scale of injury RTS is carried out at the time of admission to hospital, and on the scale of ISS - after the diagnosis of damage.
Components of the modified injury scale (RTS)
Options |
Characteristics |
Points |
The Glasgow Coma Scale |
13-15 |
4 |
9-12 |
3 |
|
6-8 |
2 |
|
4-5 |
1 |
|
3 |
0 |
|
Systolic blood pressure |
> 89 |
4 |
76-89 |
3 |
|
50 75 |
2 |
|
1-49 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Breathing rate |
10-29 |
4 |
> 29 |
3 |
|
6-9 |
2 |
|
1-5 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
The overall score for the modified injury scale is RTS = (0.9368 x Score for the Glasgow score) + (0.7326 x Systolic BP score) + (0.2908 x BT score).
General assessment of the severity of damage on the ISS scale = First maximum score on the IIS2 scale + Second maximum score on the IIS2 scale + Third maximum score on the ISS2 scale.
The maximum score for ISS is 75 points.
Estimating patient's age
Age, years |
Points |
<54 |
0 |
> 55 |
1 |
Coefficients for calculating the TRISS equation
Research |
Type of injury |
Coefficient |
Value |
The coefficients obtained in the study MT08 * |
Dumb |
IN |
-1.2470 |
IN 1 |
0.9544 |
||
AT 2 |
-0.0768 |
||
VZ |
-1.9.052 |
||
Penetrating |
IN |
-0.6029 |
|
IN 1 |
1.1430 |
||
AT 2 |
-0.1516 |
||
VZ |
-2.6676 |
||
Coefficients obtained in the Satrip study, 1990 |
Dumb |
IN |
-1.3054 |
IN 1 |
0.9756 |
||
AT 2 |
-0.0807 |
||
VZ |
-1.9829 |
||
Penetrating |
IN |
-1.8973 |
|
IN 1 |
1.0069 |
||
AT 2 |
-0.0885 |
||
VZ |
-1.1422 |
* - MTOS - Major Trauma Outcome Study (study on the evaluation of outcomes of severe trauma). The data obtained before 1986 were used.
Equation TRISS (probability of survival):
B = BO + (BI x RTS) + (B2 x ISS) + (W3 x (Points for age)). Probability of survival = 1 / (1 + Exp ((-1) x B)). Limitations: a number of researchers believe that the reliability of the results obtained by TRISS is not always high. It is suggested that additional studies may be needed to obtain more accurate coefficients for different patient groups.
Scales for assessing the severity of injury in children
Pediatric injury scale
Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS) (Tepas J. J. Et al., 1985)
Characteristic |
+2 |
+ 1 |
-1 |
Weight, kg |
> 20 |
10-20 |
<10 |
Respiratory |
Norm |
Partially passable |
Inaccessible, additional measures are required |
HELL |
> 90 mm. Gt; The heart rate is determined by a. Radialis |
50-90 mm. Gt; Art., palpable carotid pulse |
<50 mm. Gt; Art., pulse is not palpable |
Level of |
In the mind |
Disrupted |
Coma |
Open |
None |
Small |
Large or penetrating |
Damage to the |
None |
The minimum |
Open or multiple |
The total score on the scale:
9 - 12 points light trauma;
6-8 points - a potential threat to life; 0-5 points - a life-threatening condition; Less than 0 points is a fatal situation.
Score by PTS |
Exodus |
8 |
Probability of death <1% |
<8 |
It is necessary to be hospitalized in a specialized department |
4 |
Probability of death is 50% |
<1 |
Probability of death> 98% |
Children's scale of severity of trauma (Rogsy E., 1994)
Clinical |
Score |
||
+2 |
+1 |
-1 |
|
Body mass |
> 20 kg |
10-20 kg |
<10 kg |
Respiratory |
Normal |
Passable |
Impenetrable |
Systolic blood pressure |
> 90 mm Hg. Art. |
50-90 mm Hg. Art. |
<90 mm Hg. Art. |
Central |
Consciousness is |
Confusion |
Coma / Decerebriation |
Open wound |
No |
Minor |
Extensive / penetrating |
Bone |
No |
Closed |
Open / multiple fractures |
If there is no cuff for determining blood pressure, use the following scores: + 2-pulse at the wrist is palpated; +1 - the pulse in the groin is not palpable; -1 - the pulse is not palpable.
If the overall score on a scale of <8 points, immediately begin to provide care and hospitalize the child in the hospital. 7.3.
Modified scale of severity of injury
Modified assessment of injury, scores |
Scale Coma Glasgow |
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg. Art. |
Respiratory rate, min |
4 |
13-15 |
> 89 |
10-20 |
3 |
9-12 |
76-89 |
> 29 |
2 |
6-8 |
50-75 |
6-9 |
1 |
4-5 |
1-49 |
1-5 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
Each indicator has an estimate from 0 to 4 points, then all points are added (the amount is from 1 to 12). A score of <11 points indicates a serious injury.
[3]