Medical expert of the article
New publications
Fetal ultrasound: timing, goals, and what is assessed
Last updated: 06.07.2025
All iLive content is medically reviewed or fact checked to ensure as much factual accuracy as possible.
We have strict sourcing guidelines and only link to reputable media sites, academic research institutions and, whenever possible, medically peer reviewed studies. Note that the numbers in parentheses ([1], [2], etc.) are clickable links to these studies.
If you feel that any of our content is inaccurate, out-of-date, or otherwise questionable, please select it and press Ctrl + Enter.
Fetal ultrasound is the primary prenatal imaging method used to confirm the viability and gestational age of a pregnancy, assess anatomy and growth, and facilitate early detection of abnormalities and clinical decision-making. Current protocols emphasize the value of early examination in the first trimester and mandatory detailed anatomical screening in the second trimester, with selective use of Doppler ultrasonography and additional methods in risk groups. This approach improves the accuracy of dating, the detection of abnormalities, and the quality of pregnancy management. [1]
There are no universally applicable schedules for all cases, but there is a consensus: early screening should be performed between 11 and 14 weeks and routine detailed anatomical examinations should be performed between 18 and 22 weeks. Additional examinations in the third trimester are indicated for risk factors and clinical indications, and in multiple pregnancies, according to separate, more intensive schedules. [2]
Safety is based on the principle of "minimum reasonable acoustic output": thermal and mechanical indices are controlled, scanning time is limited, and non-medical "memory" procedures are not recommended. Accumulated data confirm a favorable safety profile with proper technique and adherence to standards. [3]
When and what ultrasounds to do: optimal schedule and objectives
First trimester, 11–14 weeks: confirmation of pregnancy viability and location, accurate dating based on crown-rump length, determination of fetal number and chorionicity in twins, initial anatomical examination, and risk assessment for chromosomal abnormalities and some serious defects. This interval provides the best balance between imaging and clinical significance of results. [4]
Second trimester, 18-22 weeks: routine detailed examination of fetal anatomy, assessment of placental position, and maternal anatomy parameters. This is a key window for systemic screening: when performed professionally, it detects most clinically significant malformations. [5]
Third trimester: growth, amniotic fluid, Doppler blood flow, fetal position, placental maturity, and distress markers are assessed selectively, as indicated. In low-risk populations, routine screening is considered, while in high-risk groups and with specific findings in the second half of pregnancy, follow-up ultrasounds improve management. [6]
Specific clinical trajectories: if placenta previa, risk of fetal growth restriction, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, immune conflict, multiple pregnancy, and combined obstetric risks are suspected, the frequency of ultrasound examinations increases. Specific intervals are determined by local protocols and the condition of the mother and fetus. [7]
Table 1. Recommended windows and main objectives of surveys
| Pregnancy period | Optimal time | Main tasks | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| First trimester | 11-14 weeks | Crown-rump length dating, viability, location, fetal number and chorionicity, early anatomy review | The foundation of quality antenatal care |
| Second trimester | 18-22 weeks | Detailed anatomy, placenta, basic biometric parameters | Routine for all pregnancies |
| Third trimester | Individually | Growth, water, Doppler in case of risk, presentation, fetal position | Indicated for risk factors and findings |
| Multiple pregnancy | According to individual schemes | Regular monitoring of growth and blood flow, taking into account chorionicity | More frequent visits and ultrasounds are necessary |
| [8] |
What exactly is assessed by ultrasound: protocol and measurements
Dating in the first trimester is performed using the crown-rump length and is considered the most accurate, with an error margin of approximately 5-7 days. After determining the due date through early testing, subsequent biometric measurements are used to assess size and growth rates, but not to re-date the due date without compelling reasons. [9]
In the second and third trimesters, the standard biometric set includes biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length. This set of indicators is used to calculate the approximate fetal weight and identify growth deviations. Validated international growth standards are used for interpretation. [10]
Structural anatomy is assessed systematically by organ and segment: skull and brain, face, heart, thorax, diaphragm, abdominal cavity and organs, spine, extremities, umbilical cord, and placenta. Skilled performance improves the detection of serious defects, but diagnostic accuracy varies between diseases and depends on the quality of imaging. [11]
The location of the placenta and the condition of the cervix are indicated separately, if indicated. If the placenta is low, a follow-up scan is required to determine the delivery strategy and prevent complications. [12]
Table 2. Fetal biometry: what is measured and why
| Parameter | When it is especially important | What does it show? | Clinical application |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parietal-coccygeal size | First trimester | The most accurate dating | Planning screening and pregnancy management |
| Head circumference and biparietal diameter | Second and third trimesters | Head growth and relation to the abdomen | Evaluation of growth harmony and weight calculation |
| Abdominal circumference | Second and third trimesters | Nutrition and growth, indicator of growth retardation | Monitoring the risks of hypoxia and malnutrition |
| Femur length | Second and third trimesters | Length of limbs | Confirmation of proportionality of growth |
| [13] |
What ultrasound actually finds: detection of defects and limitations
Routine anatomical screening in the second trimester detects a significant proportion of serious malformations. Detection varies by organ system: structures of the anterior abdominal wall and major defects of the central nervous system are detected more frequently, while some gastrointestinal defects and mild cardiac anomalies may be missed. [14]
Early initial screening at 11-14 weeks already allows for the detection of a significant proportion of major anomalies, and a combination of early and mid-term screening increases the overall detection rate to clinically significant levels. However, some pathologies manifest later and require follow-up. [15]
In population-based programs, the rates vary by nosology: for anencephaly, anterior abdominal wall defects, and some severe heart defects, the accuracy is high, while for intestinal anomalies and some soft tissue defects, it is lower. This emphasizes the value of standardized protocols and referrals to expert centers for questionable findings. [16]
It's important to understand the limitations of this method: fetal position, maternal constitution, scars, narrow acoustic windows, and early pregnancy all reduce visualization. In such situations, a repeat examination is planned and, if necessary, fetal echocardiography or magnetic resonance imaging is included. [17]
Table 3. Detectability of defects: benchmarks based on program and survey data
| Nosological group | Range of detection | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Major neural tube defects | High | They are detected reliably with adequate visualization. |
| Defects of the anterior abdominal wall | High | Included in the priorities of screening programs |
| Severe heart defects | Average, varies | Improves with targeted assessment and referral for echocardiography |
| Gastrointestinal tract anomalies | Lower | Often appear later and require observation. |
| [18] |
Dopplerography: when is it needed and what does it provide?
Dopplerography assesses blood flow in the maternal-placental-fetal system and is used primarily in cases of growth retardation, preeclampsia, multiple pregnancies, and other complications. The most commonly analyzed are the umbilical artery for placental resistance, the middle cerebral artery as a marker of circulatory centralization, and the ductus venosus in severe forms of fetoplacental insufficiency. [19]
In the third trimester, Doppler ultrasound is included in the assessment of high-risk pregnancies and helps determine the timing of delivery. In low-risk situations, routine use is discussed and prescribed on an individual basis. [20]
The combination of Doppler ultrasound with fetal biophysical profiling, cardiotocography, and serial biometry provides a more complete picture than any single test. The choice of monitoring frequency depends on the severity of the condition and the dynamics of the parameters. [21]
In the early stages of the first trimester, the use of pulsed Doppler is limited to clinical indications and is performed with thermal index monitoring and minimal reasonable exposure. This reduces potential biophysical effects on developing tissues. [22]
Table 4. Main vascular targets of Doppler ultrasonography and clinical conclusions
| Vessel | What is being assessed | Clinical meaning |
|---|---|---|
| umbilical artery | Placental resistance | Risk of placental insufficiency and growth retardation |
| Middle cerebral artery | Cerebral vasodilation | Response to hypoxia, calculation of cerebroplacental ratio |
| Venous duct | Venous hemodynamics | Severity of decompensation in severe growth retardation |
| Uterine arteries | Uteroplacental perfusion | Prognosis for preeclampsia risks |
| [23] |
Special situations: multiple pregnancy, cervix, placenta
In twin pregnancies, determining chorionicity and amniotic fluid status in the first trimester is critical for subsequent monitoring. In dichorionic twin pregnancies, examinations are performed regularly every few weeks, while in monochorionic pregnancies, they are performed more frequently, starting in the middle of the second trimester, to promptly identify specific complications. [24]
Second-trimester transvaginal cervical assessment is the best clinical predictor of spontaneous preterm birth in women with no history of preterm birth. In cases of short cervix, preventive interventions are discussed according to current guidelines.[25]
Low-lying placenta and placenta previa detected in the second trimester require routine reassessment in the second half of pregnancy, as the situation often improves as the uterus grows. In the presence of a uterine scar and a low-lying placenta, a targeted examination for the spectrum of placenta accreta is necessary. [26]
If fetal growth restriction or placental complications are suspected, an individualized schedule of serial measurements and Doppler monitoring is developed. The choice of intervals and tactics is determined by a combination of biometrics, Doppler ultrasound, and the clinical picture. [27]
Table 5. Who needs special studies and when
| Situation | What to add | For what |
|---|---|---|
| Monochorionic twins | Frequent follow-up ultrasound examinations with Doppler | Early detection of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome |
| Shortened cervix | Cervicometry in dynamics | Prevention of premature birth |
| Low lying placenta in the second trimester | Monitoring in the second half of pregnancy | Clarification of presentation and delivery plan |
| Suspected growth retardation | Serial biometrics, Doppler | Assessing the risk of hypoxia and choosing the timing of delivery |
| [28] |
How the study is conducted and how to prepare
No special preparation is required. It is recommended to review the results of previous examinations and discuss any questions you may have with the specialist. In early pregnancy, a moderately full bladder may be necessary for better visualization with a transabdominal probe, and for detailed anatomy and assessment of the cervix, a transvaginal approach is often used for medical reasons. [29]
The duration depends on the gestational age, fetal position, and objectives. In cases of complex visualization or unfavorable positioning, a repeat visit may be scheduled to complete the protocol without compromising quality or safety. This is a standard practice that improves the overall diagnostic yield. [30]
During the examination, the specialist sequentially evaluates the anatomy, biometry, placenta, and amniotic fluid, records findings, and forms a conclusion. If suspicious signs are detected, repeat imaging, additional fetal echocardiography, or a consultation with a specialized center is prescribed. [31]
Results are interpreted in a clinical context: values for one parameter rarely determine treatment decisions without taking into account other data and dynamics. It is consistent measurements and comparison with international standards that make conclusions robust. [32]
Table 6. Reasons for a return visit or referral to experts
| Situation | Why is this important? | Typical actions |
|---|---|---|
| Incomplete visualization of organs | Fruit or conditions interfered with the assessment | Repeat ultrasound soon |
| Suspected developmental defect | Verification required | Expert ultrasound, fetal echocardiography |
| Risks of growth and hypoxia | Dynamic control is needed | Serial biometrics and Doppler |
| Low placenta, scar on the uterus | The tactics of childbirth depend on the location | Follow-up ultrasound in the third trimester |
| [33] |
Safety: principles, indices, reasonable limits
Diagnostic ultrasound imaging during pregnancy has a favorable safety profile when the principle of minimal sound power and on-screen indicators are observed. Major organizations emphasize the absence of confirmed harmful effects in humans when the equipment is used correctly without contrast agents. [34]
Key safety parameters are the thermal and mechanical indices. Up to approximately 10 weeks, the soft tissue thermal index is monitored, and after the onset of ossification, the bone-specific index is monitored. Overexposure and unnecessary regimens should be avoided at any time. [35]
Pulsed Doppler is used in the first trimester only when indicated, with a thermal index no higher than one and a minimal exposure time. For heart rate recording, the M mode and short recording are preferred. [36]
Non-medical "memorial" studies are not recommended by regulators and industry societies. If images are released, it should be within the context of a clinical trial, without additional exposure, and without replacing medical diagnostics with entertainment. [37]
Frequently asked questions
Is frequent ultrasound harmful?
Provided safety standards are met and there is reasonable clinical need, no. Information from serial examinations in risk groups helps promptly adjust tactics and improve outcomes. [38]
Why is early dating so important?
Because it is the early fetal size that allows for the most accurate dating, and is then used to plan screenings and assess growth without constant "re-dating." [39]
Should everyone have a third-trimester ultrasound?
In low-risk pregnancies, routine comprehensive screening is discussed, and the decision is individualized. In high-risk groups, additional monitoring is warranted. [40]
What if something isn't seen on the ultrasound?
This may be due to timing factors. Repeat imaging as planned and, if necessary, referral to an expert center is a standard, safe approach. [41]

